Last month, after the LPA approved Estero Island Beach Club’s new building proposal, the Town Council denied it. The reason, not enough public benefit to warrant a 10-story building. The denial was done ‘with prejudice’ which means EIBC has to sit out the process for a year.
According to town code if an application is denied ‘with prejudice’ that applicant cannot come back to the town with a new application for 12 months. This is done to prevent the LPA and the Town Council having to look at an application over and over again, meeting after meeting. EIBC is asking the Town Council to reconsider their denial ‘with prejudice’ and change it to either a denial without prejudice or to continue their application to another date.
The EIBC team believed they were following the direction of the town staff when they proposed a 10-story building that created a view corridor from the beach from Estero Boulevard. Then the Town Council decided a view corridor wasn’t that big of a deal to them even though the town code makes reference to a view corridor as a public benefit.
The Town Council has agreed to look at whether they should change the reason for denying the EIBC proposal this Monday at their next meeting. If it is changed from ‘with prejudice’ to ‘without prejudice’ or the proposal is allowed to be continued, EIBC would be able to come back to the town with a revised plan before March of 2025.
EIBC was not asking for more density but the height of the new building certainly attracted some negative comments from residents on the island. During their first visit to the LPA, the EIBC team presented an unflattering looking building that LPA members felt was too close to Estero Boulevard. They were sent back to the drawing board and came forward with the 10-story building backed away from Estero and they eliminated two sidewalk cuts on Estero. The EIBC team believed they were responding to what town staff was asking them to do by adding a view corridor which is actually a public benefit listed in the town’s code. Apparently the LPA agreed and approved the project by a 5-2 vote back in September. They simply couldn’t sell it to this Town Council.
Before Hurricane Ian EIBC was 2 buildings of about 2-3 stories. After Hurricane Ian EIBC has less land to build on thanks to the 1978 Coastal Construction Line. A portion of the north building lost 6 units and a portion of the south building lost 2 units. The property is owned by about 2,200 to 2,300 people and operates as a time-share. And, to put one rumor to rest there is nothing in the EIBC HOA documents that says every unit has to have a clear view of the Gulf of Mexico.
Dependable, Accurate, Investigative Journalism take time. To support our work, become a BTR Monthly Member HERE.
Why does our leadership spend so much time reviewing these building requests that are totally not in our city codes/guidelines. Just think if they denied them when they came in, how much time they would have on their hands.
Why does the counsel spend so much time reviewing these building requests that are totally not in our city guidelines. Just think if they denied them when they came in, how much time they would have on their hands.
Wait a year? No. Let them keep coming back till they get it right.
Just wondering, did the town remove the “with prejudice” from the denial, or is that going to take months?
Give them another chance, with the restriction that if they don’t come back with a design to code (and loose the 2nd pool to do that) you’ll have to wait the 12 months.
Wait a year! Screw the town they will kill this beach vibrancy for people wanting to come and build and beautify the beach
Agreed they will kill the spirit of investments. We will look at rumble for many many yrs to come… so sad they have no skin in the game and the Town doesn’t care.
No, they should not have to wait a year.
Let them come back with a plan that meets code ASAP, just not 10 stories and 2x the original size of buildings. Keep to reasonable size and it can be done. Look what Neptune presented and it is NOT 10 stories.
Don’t ask for a zone changes and changes to the CPD and they can rebuild without being massive.
We want them back but within a reasonable size. No towers and residents will not have issues.
This reasoning seams to make the most sense. Compromises will be required from both sides. Let’s get to rebuilding before we get too old to enjoy again. FMB resident.